Laurent Bouton , Georgetown University, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CEPR and NBER Micael Castanheira , Université Libre de Bruxelles, FNRS and CEPR Aniol Llorente-Saguer , Queen Mary University of London
December 20, 2015
Download full paper
The rational-voter model is often criticised on the grounds that two of its central predictions (the paradox of voting and Duverger's Law) are at odds with reality. Recent theoretical advances suggest that these empirically unsound predictions might be an artifact of an (arguably unrealistic) assumption: the absence of aggregate uncertainty about the distribution of preferences in the electorate. In this paper, we propose direct empirical evidence of the effect of aggregate uncertainty in multicandidate elections. Adopting a theory-based experimental approach, we explore whether aggregate uncertainty indeed favours the emergence of non-Duverger's law equilibria in plurality elections. Our experimental results support the main theoretical predictions: sincere voting is a predominant strategy under aggregate uncertainty, whereas without aggregate uncertainty, voters massively coordinate their votes behind one candidate, who wins almost surely.
J.E.L classification codes: C92, D70
Keywords:Rational voter model, Multicandidate elections, Plurality, Aggregate